Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Lee Bengston wrote:

The only problems I have encountered with 64 bit linux versions is the
lack of 64 bit plugins like java.  On my core 2 duo laptop, I didn't
notice much speed difference between the 64 and 32 bit versions, so I
just went with the 32.

Really?  It's reading/writing 8 bytes at a time instead of 4 to your
memory.  It should be faster.

My Core2Duo laptop is a real dog for performance. I run the 64 bit Fedora on it but it's about to get a scrub and grow CentOS 5.2, for overall compatibility with the rest of my shop. Maybe that'll prove a bit better, but I doubt it. I believe there are problems in the processor implementation going deeper than the firmware/BIOS I'll have to solve. My next laptop will be a Mac.

BTW:  You can often use 32-bit versions of libraries alongside other
64-bit stuff.  I try not to, but that option is available if you
really need to run something.

Oh, one problem I did have with the 64-bit system was the Java
Hot-Spot compiler for 64-bit:  I had to downgrade from 1.6.x to
1.5.x 'cuz the compiler kept crashing.  It's a known bug and perhaps
1.7.x will fix it.  It was the Sun Java 1.6.x package in
OpenSuSE-11.0 for x86_64.

We've seen a bunch of problems in all releases of 1.6.x on the javAPRSSrvr code. Standard now is to run 1.5.4. Color this as a datapoint. I don't know I'll upgrade to 1.7.x anytime soon: I've got too many servers I use!


--
Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University        
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir

Reply via email to