>
> We wouldn't be okay with that. I think an important question is whether, if
> we decide that CC-BY-SA is a good license for dependent and independent
> styles, it would make sense to make it the mandatory license for styles
> hosted in the github repo. As I mentioned here (
> http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/use-of-CSL-styles-in-Peaya-with-changed-attribution-td5267001.html#a6360339),
> that would make it much easier for CSL adopters to comply with the licensing
> terms (currently, they'd theoretically have to check each individual style
> to see which license it uses).
>
> I don't have much of an opinion on most aspects of this - but this part I
agree with 100% - I think we should push for the repo to be on a single,
open license.
--
------
Sebastian Karcher
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Political Science
Northwestern University
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
