I am all for it. It seems very reasonable, and while it may keep a few styles 
out (?), it makes it much easier to use those styles without extra friction.

charles

On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Rintze Zelle wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> As of this moment, all the CSL styles in the style repository at 
> https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles are registered under a 
> single license, using the exact string "This work is licensed under a 
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License: 
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/";.
> 
> I added the license to styles that did not carry one, updated older versions 
> of the license, and replaced ported variants by the unported version. I got 
> permission of the style authors who had released their styles under by-nc-sa 
> licenses to switch to by-sa.
> 
> Going forward I would like to require that any new style added to the 
> repository should use Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (I already 
> included this in our requirements: 
> https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/wiki/Style-Requirements ).
> 
> If anybody has an issue with any of these changes, please let me know,
> 
> Rintze
> 
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The main question is whether CC-licenses are applicable at all to something 
> > like
> > CSL styles, or whether we should pick a software license. If everybody is
> > comfortable with CC-BY-SA, it'd like to make it the requirement for styles 
> > hosted
> > in the github repo.
> >
> > We touched on this before, but we never came to a clear conclusion. We 
> > could really
> > use some advice from somebody legally schooled.
> 
> Yes; and preferably someone with experience with these specific
> licenses, and understanding of copyright law.
> 
> I just came across this: 
> http://discovery.ac.uk/files/pdf/Licensing_Open_Data_A_Practical_Guide.pdf 
> (via http://twitter.com/#!/ostephens/statuses/75466458326511616 )
> 
> The JISC people are obviously interested in scientific publishing, so they 
> might not mind giving some advice.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Write once. Port to many.
> Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
> new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
> Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev_______________________________________________
> xbiblio-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

--
Charles Parnot
[email protected]
twitter: @cparnot
http://mekentosj.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to