On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Sebastian Karcher <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> We wouldn't be okay with that. I think an important question is whether,
>> if we decide that CC-BY-SA is a good license for dependent and independent
>> styles, it would make sense to make it the mandatory license for styles
>> hosted in the github repo. As I mentioned here (
>> http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/use-of-CSL-styles-in-Peaya-with-changed-attribution-td5267001.html#a6360339),
>> that would make it much easier for CSL adopters to comply with the licensing
>> terms (currently, they'd theoretically have to check each individual style
>> to see which license it uses).
>>
>> I don't have much of an opinion on most aspects of this - but this part I
> agree with 100% - I think we should push for the repo to be on a single,
> open license.
>
Do any of the other parties aside from Zotero that use CSL styles (i.e.
Mendeley, Mekentosj/Papers) have any legal advice on whether CC-BY-SA would
be a suitable license?
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
