Yes, please. It would be out of reach of RELAX NG, and probably Schematron as well, so a Ruby test would be great.
Rintze On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Sylvester Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 00:35 -0400, Rintze Zelle wrote: >> Also agree. Can't recall ever reading about a default, don't think >> it's a good idea, and it's not the intent of the current spec to >> allow >> setting only one of the two et-al parameters of a set ("...-min" and >> "...-use-first" for "et-al-..." and "et-al-subsequent-..."). >> >> With the hierarchical name attributes, it's not entirely >> straightforward to test for the presence of both with validation, but >> otherwise we'd screen for it. Maybe we should require that both >> attributes of a set should occur on the same element. That would also >> make it easier to ascertain that the "...-min" attribute has a higher >> value than the "...-use-first" attribute, which is commonly violated >> in submissions. > > I don't think it's hard to write a test case for both cases (which > handles inheritance) -- shall I give it a try? > > Sylvester > > >> >> Rintze ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
