On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:45 -0400, Rintze Zelle wrote: > Yes, please. It would be out of reach of RELAX NG, and probably > Schematron as well, so a Ruby test would be great.
Moving the discussion to: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/pull/2207 > Rintze > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Sylvester Keil <sylves...@keil.or.at > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 00:35 -0400, Rintze Zelle wrote: > > > > > > Also agree. Can't recall ever reading about a default, don't > > > think > > > it's a good idea, and it's not the intent of the current spec to > > > allow > > > setting only one of the two et-al parameters of a set ("...-min" > > > and > > > "...-use-first" for "et-al-..." and "et-al-subsequent-..."). > > > > > > With the hierarchical name attributes, it's not entirely > > > straightforward to test for the presence of both with validation, > > > but > > > otherwise we'd screen for it. Maybe we should require that both > > > attributes of a set should occur on the same element. That would > > > also > > > make it easier to ascertain that the "...-min" attribute has a > > > higher > > > value than the "...-use-first" attribute, which is commonly > > > violated > > > in submissions. > > > > I don't think it's hard to write a test case for both cases (which > > handles inheritance) -- shall I give it a try? > > > > Sylvester > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rintze > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
