same opinion as ronie. already wrote that to the mailing list.
if we feel parts are superfluous / can be exchanged by something better
then we should be allowed to do that.
i´m sure it won´t happen too often (look how long it took to get this
discussion rollin), but if it happens, then we should trust the skinners.
cheers
phil65
On May 24, 2012 2:40 AM, ronie <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes please :)
>
> i strongly disagree with the 'no functionality should be removed' rule.
>
> to me, it's entirely up to the skinner to develop a skin the way he sees
> fit.
> it's his call and nobody else's.
> if he wants to remove some functionality, for whatever reason, he should
> be free
> to do so and not being forced to maintain it against his will for
> another year or so.
>
> don't like the way a skin is heading? np, just rollback or pick another
> skin.
>
>
> cheers,
> ronie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Xbmc-addons mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
