disagree.. if the skinner thinks he can replace a view / widget / whatever
with something better he should be allowed to do that. and if he thinks a
feature is superfluous, he should also be allowed to remove it.
as ronie said, it´s just annoying to work with a skin if you are not
allowed to make it look / behave how you want it to.
On May 24, 2012 4:21 AM, Cory Fields <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jezz: "No functionality should be removed" only applies to automatic
> updates. Neither of your examples fit in that case.
>
> Maybe I should clarify, this is an example of what I consider to be a
> violating change:
>
> 1. User configures the views they like
> 2. Automatic update is applied that removes a view.
> 3. User no longer has the view they liked.
>
> Surely we can all agree that's rude?
>
> Let's set config and resetting to defaults aside for now and focus on
> removal.
>
> Cory
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Xbmc-addons mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
