Please allow me one last mail concerning the Final Glide issue.

I won't go into the details why the "classic" behaviour is of big advantage to me and the many others who advocated for it on this list. That has been done extensively now.

If you are one of the developers, first of all I would like to thank you for your work! And I would be happy if you would consider the following, when making the decision to reimplement a switch to get back the classic behaviour for the ones who want it, or if you are going to ignore the requests.

- There is a large group of users who want the classic way of displaying Arrival Alt (about 50% of the people who wrote on this topic) - These users are not dumb. They are experienced XC and competition pilots. (so are the ones who like the new behaviour as well) After this discussion they now understand why you implemented the new behaviour and they understand the pure MC-Theory. However they still advocate strongly to get back the old way of displaying final glide for a bunch of reasons. - You may or may not think the reasons for their wish are valid. But please don't think they just "did not understand" or they are just lazy to learn something new. That is not the case. Please carefully reread all the reasons brought forward if you really might think so. - All other gliding computers (LX, Zander...) and gliding software (SeeYou Winpilot StrePla) behaves the "classic" way for final glide display. Which is not just one value of many, it is the heart of any gliding calculator. Pilots are used to it and therefore the behaviour they expect from xcs will be different. Which is a reason for users to distrust xcs's calculations and use other software. - There is no way to do a crosscheck between two systems if below GP with MC>0 anymore. - I understand that if you designed something like the new solver and you put loads of work into it, the first reaction when constructive critisicm arises at this very late point in time is that you will be hesitant to change things that are obviously right in your perspective. However I think a big advantage of opensource is that different views on the same thing can be openly discussed and the users can give input about the things that are really important to them. - If you decide NOT to reimplement the classic display as an option what do you want to achieve?
  Reduce complexity *you think* is unnecessary?
  Educate other pilots to see things "your way"?
- Just a final thought: Wouldn't it be possible to calculate a "Thermal Gain Required"-Altitude with the resources of the old hardware gliding calculators? (Geometric Postion, Polar, Wind, Thermalstrength(MC) ) Why has none of the numerous systemdesigners ever done so for the final glide display? Don't you agree they are smart guys as well?
Maybe they had reasons...  just thinking....

You made a lot of people happy creating and enhancing this software. If the user could choose in which way final glide is displayed you would make a lot of those people really happy ! =)

This is an important issue.
The decision lies in your hands !
Please don't decide too quickly.

Greets Henrik

















Am 24.11.2011 09:44, schrieb Peter Cutting:
"Bellow glide based on your current MacCready" - Yes

I am not going to reduce my MC, as I can see good weather between me and the finish. I will make up the missing altitude by flying through the lift (hopefully without circling).

This is the normal way of doing things, and therefore what XCSoar should support first and foremost

I dont use AutoMC for some reason. Dont know much about it. Only I know what the weather looks like ahead so I like to stay in charge of the MC setting.

Peter


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Scott Penrose <sco...@dd.com.au <mailto:sco...@dd.com.au>> wrote:


    On 23/11/2011, at 7:34 PM, Peter Cutting wrote:

    . I often start a final glide "below glide" and "bump" up on the
    way *without thermalling*.

    This statement is really the key. You state you start below glide.
    Bellow what glide? Bellow glide based on your current MacCready?

    XCSoar already supports what you want by just using Auto MacCready
    on Final Glide.

    Scott




--
Peter Cutting
+46 703 580073



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d


_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user

Reply via email to