On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 21:02 +0200, Davide Bettio wrote: > Hi, > > I think that dbus specification needs to be updated: naming rules for > properties aren't clear. > > I suggest to apply this simple fix: > - Member (i.e. method or signal) names: > + Member (i.e. method, signal or property) names: >
Why do you think properties should be treated like members ? This change would apply new restriction to property names that have the potential to render a lot of existing interfaces noncompliant, for very little gain. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
