On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Aaron J. Seigo<[email protected]> wrote: > > i also don't see the necessity for more character variety in property names > than in signals, methods or other identifiers in a D-Bus service. what's the > use case, exactly, beyond preserving existing malformed services?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20948 has my comments on the issue. I will say though if someone made a patch for dbus-glib which made it optionally export properties in the suggested way (say keyed off an XML flag) I'd happily accept. I'd also suggest new dbus bindings do this by default. But changing the spec is wrong, unless you also have a time machine. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
