On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Aaron J. Seigo<[email protected]> wrote: > On September 7, 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> Why do you think properties should be treated like members ? This change >> would apply new restriction to property names that have the potential to >> render a lot of existing interfaces noncompliant, for very little gain. > right now we have an inconsistency between one type of item available in an > interface compared to all the rest. service names, methods, signals all have > these restrictions on them and properties stand out as odd ducks. consistency > is a good trait.
It makes as much sense, as forcing Java (or C++ or Python or whatever) to use same case and format for class names, constants, functions, methods, properties, namespaces and local variables. ;) -- Patryk Zawadzki _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
