On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 16:53 -0600, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > i also don't see the necessity for more character variety in property names > than in signals, methods or other identifiers in a D-Bus service. what's the > use case, exactly, beyond preserving existing malformed services? >
They are not malformed. They are perfectly conforming to the current spec. You are trying to push a deficiency of your dbus implementation in the spec... The DeviceKit properties should simply be fixed to conform to the naming convention thats stated in the spec, and David said that he'd do so. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
