--- "Diogo Quintela (EF)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Devs > > I am about to commit some changes regarding the > jelly version > required - commons-jelly and commons-jelly-xml. > I've successfully built the project with that > version, so I should > not generate any problems. > > What do you think? I'm strongly opposed to everything commons-jelly-*-SNAPSHOT - it took a load of work to eliminate all the snapshot jelly dependencies, as they provide a huge potential of incompatibilities between each oher ( and also maven... ) - unless you provide a good ground for it. Why do you need this? regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
