--- "Diogo Quintela (EF)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I though of a self build timestamp release because > of some concerns > regarding the availability of timestamp snapshots at > apache.org. But that is > a problem under resolution :) > > Regarding ibiblio, that is a no option. Related > talks at commons-dev mailing > list led into deleting snapshot releases from ibilio > (letting timestamp > builds for historical purposes) and from now on, it > seems that all > non-release versions of commons-project's will end > up at > http://cvs.apache.org/repository (where btw, are the > releases I mentioned) That's what I dislike in jelly/commons stuff -it's almost impossible to say where are the jars... ( IMHO jelly is the worst... ) Shall we add yet-another repository to our build ? ( we already got 2 of them... ) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
