My mistake.
Diogo, any clue when these jelly jars will be released "for real" ?
Also, could you point to a sample xsd declaration, that's what I was trying to achieve.
Thx,
g
On 30/08/05, Grégory Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guys,
I'm not sure we reached a consensus on this subject. However,
dependencies to "new" jelly jars were commited, which are nowhere to
be found. If this really had to be done, the least one could have done
is ensure the dependencies are available at least so the project can
be built without having to *search* for these dependencies.
The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies:
commons-jelly-20050813.225330.jar
commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913.jar
Mind you, there might even be someone outside the commiters that might
want to build a plugin (or his own), or try to provide a patch, and
wouldn't be able to.
Thanks for fixing that.
Cheers,
g
On 17/08/05, Diogo Quintela (EF) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Or lobby for them to release a stable version of jelly.
> | (Of course, that's gonna take another 6 months for all the "paperwork" to
> | be done)
>
> That's a good joke. The work and chat for a snapshot build is long lastly. I
> suppose asking for a release would make me die out of breath. :D
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list
> xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
>
