On 11/23/2017 11:15 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 22.11.17 at 20:20, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: >> +## Debugging, analysis, and crash post-mortem >> + >> +### Host serial console >> + >> + Status, NS16550: Supported >> + Status, EHCI: Supported > > Inconsistent indentation.
And I was so sure I'd checked all those. :-/ > >> + Status, Cadence UART (ARM): Supported >> + Status, PL011 UART (ARM): Supported >> + Status, Exynos 4210 UART (ARM): Supported >> + Status, OMAP UART (ARM): Supported >> + Status, SCI(F) UART: Supported >> + >> +XXX Should NS16550 and EHCI be limited to x86? Unlike the ARM >> +entries, they don't depend on x86 being configured > > ns16550 ought to be usable everywhere. EHCI is x86-only > anyway (presumably first of all because it takes PCI as a prereq) But that's just an accident at the moment; I thought there were plans at some point for ARM servers to have PCI, weren't there? I'll probably just leave this as it is, unless someone thinks differently. > With this XXX dropped (and with or without adding (x86) to > EHCI) > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Thanks, -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
