>>> On 23.11.17 at 18:08, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 11/23/2017 11:15 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 22.11.17 at 20:20, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> +## Debugging, analysis, and crash post-mortem >>> + >>> +### Host serial console >>> + >>> + Status, NS16550: Supported >>> + Status, EHCI: Supported >>> + Status, Cadence UART (ARM): Supported >>> + Status, PL011 UART (ARM): Supported >>> + Status, Exynos 4210 UART (ARM): Supported >>> + Status, OMAP UART (ARM): Supported >>> + Status, SCI(F) UART: Supported >>> + >>> +XXX Should NS16550 and EHCI be limited to x86? Unlike the ARM >>> +entries, they don't depend on x86 being configured >> >> ns16550 ought to be usable everywhere. EHCI is x86-only >> anyway (presumably first of all because it takes PCI as a prereq) > > But that's just an accident at the moment; I thought there were plans at > some point for ARM servers to have PCI, weren't there?
Right, at which point EHCI could become usable on ARM, too. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
