On 11/24/2017 08:04 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.11.17 at 18:08, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: >> On 11/23/2017 11:15 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 22.11.17 at 20:20, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> +## Debugging, analysis, and crash post-mortem >>>> + >>>> +### Host serial console >>>> + >>>> + Status, NS16550: Supported >>>> + Status, EHCI: Supported >>>> + Status, Cadence UART (ARM): Supported >>>> + Status, PL011 UART (ARM): Supported >>>> + Status, Exynos 4210 UART (ARM): Supported >>>> + Status, OMAP UART (ARM): Supported >>>> + Status, SCI(F) UART: Supported >>>> + >>>> +XXX Should NS16550 and EHCI be limited to x86? Unlike the ARM >>>> +entries, they don't depend on x86 being configured >>> >>> ns16550 ought to be usable everywhere. EHCI is x86-only >>> anyway (presumably first of all because it takes PCI as a prereq) >> >> But that's just an accident at the moment; I thought there were plans at >> some point for ARM servers to have PCI, weren't there? > > Right, at which point EHCI could become usable on ARM, too.
OK -- so I think for now I'll leave it unspecified. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
