Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Stelian Pop wrote: >> >>> Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 18:56 +0200, Heikki Lindholm a écrit : >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke >>>>>> kernel >>>>>> mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now >>>>>> latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending >>>>>> patches a comin'? >>> >>> >>> >>> So it seems I'm not alone. >>> I have done some additionnal debugging on this issue in the last days. I >>> still haven't find the bug but I narrowed it down a bit. >>> >>> >>>>> Nope, it should work as it is. But as Stelian also reported >>>>> problems on >>>>> his fresh ARM port with the in-kernel test, I cannot exclude that >>>>> there >>>>> /might/ be a problem in the benchmark. >>>>> >>>>> As I don't have any ppc64 hanging around somewhere, we will have to go >>>>> through this together. Things I would like to know: >>>> >>>> > > Hi guys, it's "/me too" time here for ppc. My mpc5200 board is jumping > out of the window when running "./latency -t1", while "./latency -t2" > works. No trace dump, hard freeze or spontaneous reboot, at your option. > OPT_NUCLEUS_DEBUG spits nothing. No issue with the regular user-space > test though. > > x86 has no problem at all. >
Ok, three smart guys, all having the same bug on their systems - who will be first shouting "I got it"? If it's an issue in my code, I'm going to pay you a beer (which I likely have to schedule already). ;) Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
