Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 15:52 schrieb Jan Kiszka:
Niklaus Giger wrote: ...
If anybody has a working target with a Xenomai + BusyBox combination and
would be willing to test drive my changes, I would appreciate a feedback
enormously.
I hope this isnt waiting on my 'approval'.
I think its a great idea, and has been on my (way too stagnant) list for
a while.
Your work has at least urged me to install busybox on my xeno-box. ;-)
My only concern is whether we've sufficiently distinguished the issues:
1 - ash vs bash
Its not entirely clear to me which flavors of sh busybox has:
ash / dash / not-bash
I gather u worked with ash, and it seems most valuable sh features
work there just fine ( shell-functions, even 'job-control' of a fashion)
2 - busybox 'executables' only
I coded in a lot of 'full linux' gimme's, like zgrep, script, etc.
Niklaus has repaired many of these. I think a more thorough cleanup is
possible,
esp if things like 'script' are jettisoned for a simpler shell-functions
or helper scripts.
This all implies a re-write, which is on my list...
(esp the job-control testing and repair)
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
