Jim Cromie wrote: > Niklaus Giger wrote: >> Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 15:52 schrieb Jan Kiszka: >> >>> Niklaus Giger wrote: ... >>> If anybody has a working target with a Xenomai + BusyBox combination and >>> would be willing to test drive my changes, I would appreciate a feedback >>> enormously. >>> > > I hope this isnt waiting on my 'approval'. > I think its a great idea, and has been on my (way too stagnant) list for > a while. > Your work has at least urged me to install busybox on my xeno-box. ;-) > > My only concern is whether we've sufficiently distinguished the issues: > > 1 - ash vs bash > > Its not entirely clear to me which flavors of sh busybox has: > ash / dash / not-bash > I gather u worked with ash, and it seems most valuable sh features > work there just fine ( shell-functions, even 'job-control' of a fashion) > > 2 - busybox 'executables' only > > I coded in a lot of 'full linux' gimme's, like zgrep, script, etc. > Niklaus has repaired many of these. I think a more thorough cleanup is > possible, > esp if things like 'script' are jettisoned for a simpler shell-functions > or helper scripts. > This all implies a re-write, which is on my list... > (esp the job-control testing and repair)
Just stumbled over this again while cleaning up my mailbox. What's the status? Waiting for improvements, or waiting for /someone/ to type svn ci (and improve the topics above later)? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
