On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 06:54 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 21:51 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > >> > > > >> o -D__XENO__ > > > > > > > > POSIX code may be compiled either against the regular Linux support, or > > > > against the Xenomai one; this define provides a standard signature to > > > > test for in order to detect the second case, if need be. > > > > > > Ok. Should we restrict it to --posix-cflags then? > > > > > > > No objection, but in such a case, we'd be better off moving the define > > somewhere in include/posix/*.h. Gilles? > > Since there are several files in include/posix and users are not > supposed to include them all, it seems easier to force the flag in > --posix-cflags. >
Ack. I was thinking of moving this define to a base header, but if we really don't have any there, then let's keep it the way it is. -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
