On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> the "trivial" bugs are fixed already: see #2152 for the reason why
> rt_dev_read timeouts took too long (the timer mode was ignored by
> xnsynch_sleep_on),


>  and I also found a yet invisible bug in
> rtdm_toseq_init that would have picked the wrong time base (#2153).

Using xnpod_current_thread()'s time base in rtdm_toseq_init() will
always pick the master one when called over a secondary mode context,
which according to the doc, is allowed. Is this intended?

> Now just that rtcanrecv issue remains...
> Jan

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to