Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Hi Philippe, >>> >>> the "trivial" bugs are fixed already: see #2152 for the reason why >>> rt_dev_read timeouts took too long (the timer mode was ignored by >>> xnsynch_sleep_on), >> Ok. >> >>> and I also found a yet invisible bug in >>> rtdm_toseq_init that would have picked the wrong time base (#2153). >>> >> Using xnpod_current_thread()'s time base in rtdm_toseq_init() will >> always pick the master one when called over a secondary mode context, >> which according to the doc, is allowed. Is this intended? > > rtdm_toseq_init will only be called over primary context, it belongs > into the same context as rtdm_mutex_timedlock, rtdm_sem_timeddown, etc. >
OK, got your point: you were referring to the rtdm_toseq_init doc which talks about secondary mode usage - this needs fixing now (and never made any sense :( ). Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
