Re: Changing include to include/xercesc

[Murray Cumming]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >Anything that makes it difficult for me to build an app against the Xerces
> >source tree or a binary release without code changes, doesn't sound like a
> >good thing.
> 
> Would one way to allow folks to take their time moving to the new includes
> be to set up files with the old names that just include the new ones...?
> 
> (I don't have a position on the proposal.)

How many times do I have to say this?:
There will be no need to change existing code.

-- 
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]