Hold on! I think some people are answering the wrong question. The question is not (yet) "how do you want to implement the renaming?" But simply "do you want to rename the include dir?" Iff we decide to rename it, then we should discuss the pros and cons of the different ways to implement it, and we may want to vote on this again. But people shouldn't vote against the renaming because they are against a particular way of implementing it. -- Arnaud Le Hors - IBM, XML Standards Strategy Group / W3C AC Rep. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Murray Cumming
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc Joseph_Kesselman
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc Herb Chong
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Murray Cumming
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc Hespelt, Steve (Exchange)
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc VAN DYCK Pieter
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc Jason E. Stewart
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc Jesse Pelton
