"Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> >
> > However, Xerces-C is already in the debian distro and has been for some
> > time.
>
> That's good news, and I'd be interested to know how they go about
> building the .debs. I can't believe that they tolerated Xerces-C dumping
> all its includes in the top of <prefix>/include.
>
> I also don't know how they deal with the strange Xerces-C versioning. I
> guess that there's no apps in debian that depend on Xerces-C, so binary
> compatibility and versioning isn't an issue yet.
I forwarded Tinny's summary to Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the
package maintainer for xerces on debian, I'd like to hear how he feels
about the issue.
Yes, they do not have other modules that depend on xerces, but as soon
as my maintainer registration is finished, xerces-p will depend on it.
jas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
