On 11/01/2008, Sebastian Trüg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just my 2 cents: > Soprano has a IMOH very good DBus API [1] for RDF storage which fulfills all 3 > of your requirements below. We already use it for Nepomuk and it works great. > And since Xesam is already using URIs to identify stuff why not go the extra > mile to RDF storage altogether?
I thought Soprano depended on Qt? Anyways, I don't think the RDF quadruples is a good thing to expose directly to the programmers who just want a quick and dirty metadata storage. It is simply just too technical. That does not mean that we cannot use that stuff under the hood though. > Timestamps are handled via named graphs [2], also known as context (RDF > quadruples). Are you suggesting putting the mtime in the name of each RDF triple? If we are to support timestamps I don't think we should expose them as RDF quadruples because I still think that it is too much abstraction to present to the end user developer. Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
