В сообщении от Saturday 12 January 2008 01:05:38 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen написал(а): > On 11/01/2008, Sebastian Trüg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just my 2 cents: > > Soprano has a IMOH very good DBus API [1] for RDF storage which fulfills > > all 3 of your requirements below. We already use it for Nepomuk and it > > works great. And since Xesam is already using URIs to identify stuff why > > not go the extra mile to RDF storage altogether? > > I thought Soprano depended on Qt?
This is not a dependency that you can't easily get rid of. > Anyways, I don't think the RDF quadruples is a good thing to expose > directly to the programmers who just want a quick and dirty metadata > storage. It is simply just too technical. That does not mean that we > cannot use that stuff under the hood though. Which part of ( URI, property name, property value , timestamp ) programmers can't understand and why should it be hidden? > > Timestamps are handled via named graphs [2], also known as context (RDF > > quadruples). > > Are you suggesting putting the mtime in the name of each RDF triple? > If we are to support timestamps I don't think we should expose them as > RDF quadruples because I still think that it is too much abstraction > to present to the end user developer. -- Evgeny _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
