On 12/01/2008, Evgeny Egorochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > В сообщении от Saturday 12 January 2008 01:05:38 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen > написал(а): > > On 11/01/2008, Sebastian Trüg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just my 2 cents: > > > Soprano has a IMOH very good DBus API [1] for RDF storage which fulfills > > > all 3 of your requirements below. We already use it for Nepomuk and it > > > works great. And since Xesam is already using URIs to identify stuff why > > > not go the extra mile to RDF storage altogether? > > > > I thought Soprano depended on Qt? > > This is not a dependency that you can't easily get rid of. > > > Anyways, I don't think the RDF quadruples is a good thing to expose > > directly to the programmers who just want a quick and dirty metadata > > storage. It is simply just too technical. That does not mean that we > > cannot use that stuff under the hood though. > > Which part of ( URI, property name, property value , timestamp ) programmers > can't understand and why should it be hidden?
Exactly my point :-) ( URI, property name, property value , timestamp ) is fine, but exposing the general Named Graph terminology (and features) in the API is too generic to my taste. If we say that the triple name is always a timestamp I am ok with it. However I thought names had to be unique. Timestamps are generally not... Maybe I did not read that Named Graph spec properly. Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
