Sorry, I'd rather say there is too little space on top, not too much, the two characters are practically stuck on top, while there should be--FontForge and Pango show it--some additional space. Are you sure our outputs are the same?
Le samedi 05 février 2011 à 23:07 +0100, Adam Twardoch (List) a écrit : > On 11-02-05 22:41, Alessandro Ceschini wrote: > > Yeah, as I told you I'd taken a look in FontForge and it came out font > > designers had anticipated such combination in the kerning pairs table. > > In effect it works in PangoView but I can't figure out how to direct the > > output toward a pdf, so I can't show you the right kerning, anyhow there > > should be more space, that's obvious. > > There should be some bug in XeTeX, I guess it doesn't look for kerning > > pairs that involve alternate glyphs. > Well, no, it certainly *does* look into for kerning pairs -- your and my > tests obviously indicate that there is *lots* of kerning between the two > glyphs in question, in fact, *too* much. > > So XeTeX does kern, it just does something wrong in the process, perhaps > adding some additional kerning value on top. > > A. > >
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
