>>> Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10.02.03 15:33 >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:26:49 +0100, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
>>> Depends on your board. Send me a log at depth 24 and I'll take a >>> closer look. >> Included at the bottom. Again, "Not loading .debug line" lines >> are cut out. The only change made to my XF86Config was to change >> DefaultDepth to 24 instead of 16. > Yep, even though the cards can do it, they're not great boards to > be displaying 1600x1200@75Hz with 24bit depth. I'd use 1280x1024 if > you really need 24bit depth. Or drop to 16bit depth and keep using > 1600x1200. I'll be dropping to 16bit then. >>>>>> One last thing; if someone else has this card, could you verify that it >>>>>> has 8MB of RAM? I thought it had 16MB, but I might be mistaken and have >>>>>> long since lost the manuals (X auto probes 8MB). >>>>> Yes, The card has 8MB of videoram, but probably has another 8MB of EDO >>>>> memory - usually used for 3D. The driver only reports the videoram as >>>>> it currently doesn't have a 3D driver and looses the other 8MB of EDO. >>>> Doesn't have a 3D driver? Does that mean I won't get any OpenGL >>>> acceleration out of this card with XFree86? >>> Nope. >> "Nope" as in my conclusion is wrong and I will get OpenGL acceleration or >> "Nope" as in confirming that I won't get any OpenGL acceleration? >> (/me clinging to a straw of hope) > Nope as in, it doesn't have a 3D driver. So therefore you won't get > any GL acceleration. Damn! But thank you for all help, and so expedient too. - IT _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
