Message text written by "G. Ken Holman"
>I find unqualified and unsubstantiated claims of inappropriateness are 
difficult to defend, so I hope the reader will make their own decision 
about how easy or difficult XSLT is to use.  There are a number of free 
resources noted in the FAQ where one can learn more.  I've released on our 
web site a free download excerpt (covering the context and introduction to 
XSLT) of my own book.

I hope this helps.

.................. Ken
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Ken, 

I know you a big advocate of XSLT and you have authored much
on training and learning XSLT.  Good to see the other side of the 
coin expoused.

Anyway - part of this is as you say a 'gut thing', and just like 
BetaMax and VHS, the market will ultimately decide.

I would stand by my assertion that XSLT is a programmer toolset,
and this is based on extensive XML/XSLT teaching, where 
non-technical audiences used to using EDI translation mapper
technologies ask the question 'and we are supposed to do what with
this now?'.   

There are already many good alternatives in the area of 
B2B information exchanges, and I firmly see that people will
vote based on business applicability and need.

This is not a bad thing!  Also I would expect solutions based on
ebXML compliant technologies to more nearly match B2B
information needs, than something like XSLT - which just
because you add 'T' to the name, does not fundamentally
alter that fact that the heritage is from markup stylesheet land
which is a whole different mindset to EDI, code and element,
and business information interchanges.

DW.



------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
Homepage http://www.XMLedi-Group.org

Unsubscribe send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank

Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)

digest xmledi-group your-email-address

To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm


Reply via email to