In Peter's defense I would say he does not seem to be confused, just
expressing normal skepticism.
His statements made in the course of the discussion I can summarize as
following:
1. There is no need for intermediate XML transformation.
2. OK, I agree that intermediate XML transformation is useful, but tools
other than XSLT can do it as well.
3. OK, I agree XSLT brings some benefits compare to other tools, but I
don't believe it until I see it in action.

As a long time XSLT developer I find this course of argumentation fair and
convincing to continue with XSLT.
Thank you
|------------------------+------------------------+------------------------|
|                        |   "Benoit Marchal      |                        |
|                        |   (Mailing Lists)"     |   � � � � To:          |
|                        |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|                        |   om>                  |   � � � � cc:          |
|                        |                        |   (bcc: Boris          |
|                        |   03/06/2002 09:52 AM  |   Frenkel/I&TS/EYLLP/US|
|                        |                        |   )                    |
|                        |                        |   � � � � Subject:     |
|                        |                        |   RE: Re[4]: Using     |
|                        |                        |   XSLT..               |
|------------------------+------------------------+------------------------|







At 14:32 6/03/02, OLIVOLA Peter wrote:
>The only value to this distinction that I can think of would be if
>middlewareA needed to be replaced by middlewareB and was possible to
>unplug middlwareA, plug in middlewareB, turn it on and voila! no fuss no
>muss, everything works exactly as it did with middlewareA.

That is not what we have been discussing.
I am under the impression you're still confused on this issue of
pre-parsing and intermediate XML representation. I'm afraid that I can't
see how to make it clearer without organizing an actual demonstration...
which won't be easy on the mailing list so I'll leave it at that.

--ben

Applied XML Solutions at www.marchal.com
"concise, useful, and illuminating," Dr Dobbs Journal



------ � XML/edi Group Discussion List � ------
Homepage = �http://www.XMLedi-Group.org

Unsubscribe = �send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank

Questions/requests: �[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)

digest xmledi-group your-email-address

To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm








______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP



------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
Homepage =  http://www.XMLedi-Group.org

Unsubscribe =  send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank

Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)

digest xmledi-group your-email-address

To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm


Reply via email to