Kevin Flynn wrote: > > I am not surprised at XmlMind's decision, I've been a guilty beneficiary of > their liberal licensing policy for may years. > > I'm a HEAVY user of XXE but I haven't bought a license. I didn't even take > up the offer of a free professional license I was offered a couple of years > ago. The reason I haven't done so is that there are a number of other *very* > occasional (maybe once a month?) users in my company for whom the purchase > of a license is difficult to justify. Basically, I have stuck to the > standard version in order to prevent myself using additional functionality > that would then be unavailable to these other occasional users. > > I wonder if I'm the only one who has stuck with the standard version for > this reason? Is some kind of floating license a possibility? The existing > site license is not appropriate as it is way out of scale with our needs and > also because we are a highly distributed company. >
Our commercial licenses are ``floating licenses''. Always been. That is, a license is not bound to a specific user. --- The Software may be installed on any number of host machines at this location, as long as the number of concurrent users does not exceed the total number of users for which the applicable license fee has been paid. --- See http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/license_pro.html We'll slightly change our commercial licenses to make this point even clearer.
