On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
On 06/21/13 21:14, Keith Packard wrote:
Matt Dew <[email protected]> writes:

Thanks Chris.

    Keith, I can't just apply patches in the stable branch though
    right?

You can, but as this code is also broken on master, it's best to have it
committed to master and then cherry-picked to the stable branch.

I'll merge it to master in a day or so (to give other people time to see
it and potentially review it).


I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above happening.
That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release notice "that
this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit misleading. As
I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my patch is
applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the last two weeks,
it works fine too.

Hi Chris,
I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that patch so I didn't include it in 1.14.2.

It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this regard, 'not building' is the same as 'doesn't work'.

Matt




Chris


_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to