Ping?

On 08/26/2013 03:06 PM, Matt Dew wrote:
> Keith,
>   I saw you did a R-b back on Jun 21, did that make it into trunk that I
> can cherry-pick?
>
> thanks,
> Matt
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Chris Clayton <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Matt.
>
>
>     On 06/27/13 02:46, Matt Dew wrote:
>
>         On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
>
>     [snip]
>
>
>             I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above
>             happening.
>             That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release
>             notice "that
>             this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit
>             misleading. As
>             I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my
>             patch is
>             applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the
>             last two weeks,
>             it works fine too.
>
>
>         Hi Chris,
>             I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that
>         patch so I
>         didn't include it in 1.14.2.
>
>
>      From a quick look at the source, I see that my patch has not been
>     applied yet. Like the 1.14.2 release candidates, 1.14.2.902 does not
>     build without it when the compiler is a recent 4.8 gcc release.
>
>     Chris
>
>
>              It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this
>         regard, 'not
>         building' is the same as 'doesn't work'.
>
>         Matt
>
>
>
>
>             Chris
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to