Keith, I saw you did a R-b back on Jun 21, did that make it into trunk that I can cherry-pick?
thanks, Matt On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Chris Clayton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt. > > > On 06/27/13 02:46, Matt Dew wrote: > >> On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote: >> > [snip] > > >>> I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above happening. >>> That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release notice "that >>> this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit misleading. As >>> I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my patch is >>> applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the last two weeks, >>> it works fine too. >>> >> >> Hi Chris, >> I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that patch so I >> didn't include it in 1.14.2. >> >> > From a quick look at the source, I see that my patch has not been applied > yet. Like the 1.14.2 release candidates, 1.14.2.902 does not build without > it when the compiler is a recent 4.8 gcc release. > > Chris > > > It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this regard, 'not >> building' is the same as 'doesn't work'. >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> >>> Chris >>> >>> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
