Hi Matt.
On 06/27/13 02:46, Matt Dew wrote:
On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
[snip]
I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above happening.
That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release notice "that
this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit misleading. As
I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my patch is
applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the last two weeks,
it works fine too.
Hi Chris,
I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that patch so I
didn't include it in 1.14.2.
From a quick look at the source, I see that my patch has not been
applied yet. Like the 1.14.2 release candidates, 1.14.2.902 does not
build without it when the compiler is a recent 4.8 gcc release.
Chris
It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this regard, 'not
building' is the same as 'doesn't work'.
Matt
Chris
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
