Oops. I didn't notice your email. Great, I see that the solution is even better.
Personally, I would not worry about the non-cairo version. Denis, what do you think? On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Immi Halupczok <i...@karimmi.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I now implemented Denis's idea of having an additional dummy point in > the file; it seems to work fine (though it needs more testing). What I > wasn't aware of is that it even has another advantage compared to all my > previous ideas: If one creates a file with new xournal, edits it with > old xournal, and then opens it with new xournal again, nothing got lost. > (In my prev. ideas, editing it with old xournal in between would delete > the first line widths.) > > > Something else I noticed: Up to now I only modified the cairo version of > the pdf and print routines. Should the non-cairo version > (pdf_draw_page()) also be updated, or are the long-term plans to remove > this? > > > > Best, > Immi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Xournal-devel mailing list > Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel > -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Xournal-devel mailing list Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel
