On 09/04/2016 03:03 PM, dmg wrote: > Oops. I didn't notice your email. > > Great, I see that the solution is even better. > > Personally, I would not worry about the non-cairo version. Denis, what > do you think?
Indeed, don't worry. It's a "legacy" PDF export, so I'm sure people won't mind if it doesn't have the nicer-looking lines in it. The non-cairo/gtk-print PDF export is still useful because it seems that each of the two PDF export methods works well on most files but really does a horrible job on certain files, in a completely different manner -- so if one produces unacceptable results it's good to have the other around as a backup, but the 'legacy' version doesn't need to have all the latest improvements/optimizations. (I might also implement it when I incorporate the patch into upstream). Best, Denis -- Denis Auroux UC Berkeley, Department of Mathematics 817 Evans Hall, Berkeley CA 94720-3840, USA aur...@math.berkeley.edu ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Xournal-devel mailing list Xournal-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xournal-devel
