On 26 Mar 2002, Jez Tucker wrote:
> > Further investigation shows that there is some hair in
> > the code that determines the screen layouts. Reverse the
> > order of your Screen 0 and Screen 1 entries in your Layout
> > section. Shouldn't be necessary, but oh well.
>
> That's quite true. I changed it round as per your suggestion and whaddya
> know! A working desktop. In retrospect this seems entirely sensible.
> One should not be able to reference a screen that exists 'in the
> future', in terms of config files. I'm sure I read in the docs that
> items could be declared in any order however...
Yes, it sets these up sequentially. Screen 1's position
references the position of Screen 0, which hasn't been positioned
yet, so it just sticks Screen 1 at (0,0). It probably should
be done another way, but the problem can get messy quickly.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
