> > Summary: > > Started dvc development > > Revision: > > xtla--dev--1.2--patch-21 > > Glad to see that :-).
Wow crazy. \C-a \C-k. Really surprised at your great vitality. > However, it would be better if you could open a new branch (perhaps > dvc--dev--0), I'll release Xtla 1.2 shortly with only baz and tla > support, so I'll not merge your patch in xtla--main--1.2. I agree with Matthieu. We should keep the 1.2 tree for stability and merging to GNU Emacs. I think we shuold call your new work "2.0" or you should give new name. Masatake
