Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Summary: >> Started dvc development >> Revision: >> xtla--dev--1.2--patch-21 > > Glad to see that :-). > > However, it would be better if you could open a new branch (perhaps > dvc--dev--0), I'll release Xtla 1.2 shortly with only baz and tla > support, so I'll not merge your patch in xtla--main--1.2.
Agreed. Good idea. From which branch should I start working to make the merging easy? Is xtla--dev--1.2--patch-20 o.k. Or can I use xtla--dev--1.2--patch-21? Or should I use your main branch? > A few more things: It's nice to start hacking, to get an idea of what > is to be done and how it can be done, but we should also start > writting a small spec, and ask for opinion on more general lists than > this one (emacs-devel or so, but I don't read it, so, cross-post, or > ask me to subscribe). I started the work to have a kind of playground. And the way started the structuring (file names, function names) should start a discussion. Masatake already had a few nice ideas that I can use from now on. > I've started something here: > > http://wiki.gnuarch.org/xtla > > (It can move to a docs/ directory of DVC later, but it's better to > keep it as open as possible for the moment, so a wiki is more > appropriate IMO). The wiki is a good place to write ideas for the development down. I think it is a good idea, that you start your work on bzr and I do some work for mercurial. That will help to get a reusable dvc layer. Stefan.
