Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Agreed. Good idea. From which branch should I start working to make > the merging easy?
I've just opened a [EMAIL PROTECTED] in which I've merged your patch. > I started the work to have a kind of playground. And the way started > the structuring (file names, function names) should start a discussion. > Masatake already had a few nice ideas that I can use from now on. Good. I'm starting this for bzr too. I think a reasonable mid-term objective is to have a fully operational diff command. This means in particular * A working process management infrastructure. * A working buffer management infrastructure. * A more generic tla--prepare-changes-buffer. And later * A working recursive command management. * An integration with ediff. Doing this for xhg and bzr in parallel without breaking Xtla itself sounds like a reasonable objective. I've opened bugs in the bugtracker for all those. Please add your comments and use the "Assigned to" field _before_ starting hacking if you plan non trivial modifications. Otherwise, we'll race on those. (starts being exciting, isn't it ?) -- Matthieu
