Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Agreed. Good idea. From which branch should I start working to make >> the merging easy? > > I've just opened a [EMAIL PROTECTED] in which > I've merged your patch.
I have created a dvc--dev--0 branch >> I started the work to have a kind of playground. And the way started >> the structuring (file names, function names) should start a discussion. >> Masatake already had a few nice ideas that I can use from now on. > > Good. I'm starting this for bzr too. Fine. > I think a reasonable mid-term objective is to have a fully operational > diff command. This means in particular > > * A working process management infrastructure. > * A working buffer management infrastructure. > * A more generic tla--prepare-changes-buffer. > > And later > > * A working recursive command management. > * An integration with ediff. > > Doing this for xhg and bzr in parallel without breaking Xtla itself > sounds like a reasonable objective. Sounds good. However, I will add probably the 'add' and the 'commit' commands first. > I've opened bugs in the bugtracker for all those. Please add your > comments and use the "Assigned to" field _before_ starting hacking if > you plan non trivial modifications. Otherwise, we'll race on those. > > (starts being exciting, isn't it ?) Seconded ;-) Stefan.
