On , December 2, 2004 at 21:39:39, Stefan Reichör wrote: > Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Date: Don 02.12.2004 um 19:49 By: Robert Widhopf-Fenk <widhopf> > > And well I think we do not need it in the inventory. > > > > People should to the commit from the changes buffer in order to > > write good log messages and see only the modified files. > > > > > > > > Or what reasons/use-cases are there to do it from the inventory > > buffer? > > Well, I often start to commit from the inventory buffer. Then I > display the changes to see the modifications to describe them.
Why not do C-x T = directly? I see no reason why go to the changes buffer by C-x T i = So the real question is: Is there any good reason to commit without knowing which files have changes and will be part of the commit? IMHO not! Even when importing or adding I want to know which files have changed or are new. In those cases I just do not care about the --diff, so be may allow the changes buffer to only show the changes without diff, which is C-u C-x T = :-) > So I see two scenarios: > > 1. Start the commit from the inventory buffer > Display the changes > > 2. Display the changes > Open the commit log from the changes buffer > > Now we support both ways. We should not drop one of them. Do let's drop 1. Cheers Robert
