On , December 4, 2004 at 00:11:46, Stefan Reichör wrote: > Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I see no reason why go to the changes buffer by C-x T i = > > > > Actually, for several Xtla users, the inventory buffer seems to be > > the "home" (starting point, the place you go where you don't know > > where to go else). I'm not sure this is a good thing (personnaly, > > I almost never use inventory. tla-changes to view changes, and > > tla-tree-lint to fix problems with the inventory is always > > sufficient), but well, if they like it ... ;-) > > > > Considering this, commit is not "C-x T i =", but simply "=", and > > it seems to make sense. > > Perhaps it can be explained in comparison with the cvs and svn > status buffers. They provide a similar interface. And most users > know that interfaces.
Sure, but our inventory buffer does not display the status of the file, so it is not exactly the same and while its o.k. to leave the "=" binding in the inventory buffer [1], I think we should not provide a way to directly commit from it ... my reasons are still the same, why would I do a commit without being sure what I commit. I never meant to drop the binding and in fact it is cool to switch between tla-buffer with a single key stroke ... Robert
