Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harald Meland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> The fact that it's named .arch-log-library and not .tla-log-library >>> is also intentional: Another arch client could use it. >> >> Until there actually is some agreement to use this kind of structure >> from other frontends besides xtla, I think it would make more sense if >> the directory name better reflected the fact that the structure >> currently is xtla-specific. > > I disagree here: This would mean renaming the directory if someone > else starts using it. I don't like the idea of moving configuration > directories from one version to the other.
What about creating a second directory called "~/.arch-frontends/" (or perhaps something good) for non-Xtla specific stuff? So, "~/.xtla/" would contain our stuff, and "~/.arch-frontends/" would contain stuff that is potentially useful for other front-ends. I'm not overly concerned either way; just thought I'd toss out the idea. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
